CMS responds to OIG review of rehab facilities
Recovery Auditor Report, August 19, 2010
Inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF) were the recent target of two OIG reviews. While the reports on the reviews contain information pertinent to IRFs, the official CMS response to the findings is notable to many different types of providers.
The first report, a nationwide review of IRF transmission of patient assessment instruments for calendar years (CY) 2006 and 2007, showed that IRFs didn’t always submit required patient assessment data in timely fashion, which would trigger a reduction in the case-mix group payment, according to Nancy J. Beckley, MS, MBA, CHC, president of Nancy Beckley & Associates LLC in Milwaukee, WI.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- CMS seeks comment on quality measures
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Nursing responsibilities for managing pain
- CMS creates web portal for questions about 1135 waivers, PHE
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- ICD-10-CM coma, stroke codes require more specific documentation
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- The consequences of an incomplete medical record
- E-mailed
-
- Coronavirus vaccination: 4 best practices for communicating with patients
- Q&A: Pressure ulcer POA code confusion resolved
- Neurological checks for head injuries
- Keyes Q&A: Generator lighting, fire dampers, eyewash stations, ISLM fire drills
- Including 46600 in E/M leveling systems
- How to get reimbursed for restorative nursing
- Fetal non-stress tests represent important part of maternal and fetal health
- Coding, billing, and documentation tips for teaching physicians, interns, residents, and students
- Coding tip: Know how to correctly code each procedure an otolaryngologist can perform on turbinates
- Coding Clinic reiterates guidelines for provider documentation
- Searched