RACs deny post-discharge queries
Recovery Auditor Report, August 5, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Recovery Auditor Report!
The provider community is reporting a new trend of late: RACs are denying post-discharge queries despite published guidance which states that this is an allowable practice.
In October 2008, the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) published the article “Managing an Effective Query Process,” which states that retrospective queries are permissible and are “effective in cases where additional information is available in the health record, in short stays where concurrent review was not complete, or whenever a concurrent query process is not feasible.”
Despite the AHIMA guidelines, providers are seeing cases with retrospective queries being denied as a result of the RAC’s individual policy. Sarah Shaver, RHIA, CCS, RAC coordinator at Moses Cone Health System in Greensboro, NC, provides an example.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Recovery Auditor Report!
Related Products
-
2010 RAC Track: Medicare Compliance Forum Audio Recording
On-demand audio recordings of the RAC track of HCPro Revenue Cycle Institute's popular Medicare Compliance Forum, held May...
-
Medicare Compliance Forum: Orlando, FL
Attend the 2012 Medicare Compliance Forum to reduce your organization’s risk and exposure from government auditors...
-
Outpatient, Observation, or Inpatient?
Attend the half-day seminar, Outpatient, Observation or Inpatient? Walking the Tightrope of Regulatory Guidance, September...
-
OPPS and IPPS Reimbursement Fundamentals
Attend OPPS and IPPS Reimbursement Fundamentals, a half-day seminar on September 30 in Orlando. You'll learn to understand...
-
2010 Observation Services Track:
On-demand audio recordings of the Observation Services track of HCPro Revenue Cycle Institute's popular Medicare Compliance...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Searched