ACMA takes second Important Message for Medicare concerns to CMS
Patient Access Weekly Advisor, March 17, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Access Weekly Advisor!
The following article is adapted from HCPro’s resource for hospital case managers—www.CaseManagementMentor.com—a free blog dedicated to connecting hospital case managers to industry pacesetters, peers, and best practices.
American Case Management Association (ACMA) CEO Greg Cunningham met with CMS officials recently to discuss the results of the ACMA Public Policy Committee’s survey about the second Important Message from Medicare (IM).
The ACMA said CMS was “receptive to the feedback.” Survey results reveal that:
- The majority of respondents (84%) report that case management is responsible for issuing the second IM
- More than half of the respondents (59%) report that 10 minutes or fewer are mecessaru to issue each IM
- More than 77% of respondents report that they track IM compliance
- Of those who track IM compliance 40% report a compliance rate between 76% and 100%
- Only 38% of respondents report increased numbers of appeals
- The majority report that less than 25% of patient appeals are successful
- Respondents generally think the second IM process adds little value to patient care and adds to patient confusion and frustration
Read the full CMS Important Message / Appeal Rights Notification Requirement Survey Findings report.
CMS officials asked the association to compile a of the most pressing concerns pertaining to delivery of the second IM. The ACMA and CMS will work together to address the top 10.
Click here to read the rest of this post, or share your thoughts on this topic.
Browse more blog posts at www.CaseManagementMentor.com.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Access Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Searched
