HealthDataInsights launches new RAC Web site, posts issues eligible for audits
Patient Access Weekly Advisor, August 19, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Access Weekly Advisor!
HealthDataInsights, Inc. (HDI), launched its new RAC Web site, and posted the first set of issues eligible for RAC review throughout all 20 RAC Region D states and territories on August 12. The list of issues will likely be familiar to healthcare providers who saw those announced by Connolly Healthcare earlier this month. HDI has posted the following approved issues:
- Neulasta (HCPCS code J2505). RACs will review claims submitted with the total number of milligrams instead of one unit per 6mg. Providers should submit claims for J2505 so that the units billed represent the number of multiples of 6mg administered, not the total number of mgs.
- Newborn Pediatric CPT Codes Billed for Patients Exceeding Age Limit. Certain service codes are specific to patients of a specific age and should not be applied or billed for patients who exceed the age limit defined by the CPT code.
- Once in a Lifetime. Certain procedures are only performed once in a person’s lifetime. RACs will seek to identify claims paid for those procedures for more than one service date.
- Excessive Units—Untimed Codes. When reporting service units for untimed codes (excluding modifiers -KX and -59) where the procedure is not defined by a specific time frame, the provider should enter a “1” in the units bill column per date of service.
- Excessive Units—Blood Transfusions. Providers should bill blood transfusions with a maximum of one unit per patient per date of service.
- Excessive Units—Bronchoscopy. Providers should bill bronchoscopy services with a maximum number of one unit per patient per date of service.
- Excessive Units—IV Hydration. Providers should bill IV hydration with a maximum number of one unit per patient per date of service.
Read the full story on the Revenue Cycle Institute Web site.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Access Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Searched
