Surprise! Voluntary refunds don't protect against RACs
Recovery Auditor Report, August 6, 2009
For many providers, self-auditing has become an important RAC preparation tool. Certainly, internal audit results can show where additional education is necessary to ensure appropriate coding, billing, and documentation practices. And this will result in fewer RAC denials, because if practices are correct, the RACs will find fewer errors to deny.
But many providers also assume that reporting errors (and refunding identified overpayments) discovered while self-auditing will protect those claims from RAC review.
Not so, says CMS.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Don’t forget the three checks in medication administration
- Differentiate between types of wound debridement
- Complications from immobility by body system
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Joint Commission’s top-cited standards list gives hospitals plenty to work on
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- What is the difference between an IPA and a medical group?
- Know guidelines and subtle differences in code descriptions for laceration repairs
- Understand which parts of the medical record coders can use
- E-mailed
-
- CMS shifts from denials to RTPs for home health claims with no matching OASIS
- Focusing on OR fire prevention
- Program coordinator importance
- Reimbursement for Facility and Professional Services in a Provider-Based Department by Gina M. Reese, Esq., RN
- Q/A: Payment for HCPCS code J2354
- Q/A: Charging for venipunctures
- Q&A: Reporting stent placement with other procedures
- Q&A: Postop pain/nausea medication, antibiotics generally not separately billable
- Injections and infusions continue to confuse coders
- HIPAA Q&A: PHI sent to wrong address
- Searched