CMS Releases RAC Audit Phase-in Strategy: Complex reviews to arrive as soon as August
Recovery Auditor Report, July 9, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Recovery Auditor Report!
CMS released further information June 24 on its RAC Web site letting healthcare providers know when they can expect RACs to begin auditing. The new “CMS RAC Review Phase-in Strategy,” details different types of reviews and dates CMS anticipates the reviews will begin in various areas of the country.
The new information is consistent with CMS' previous indications that some providers may begin to undergo automated review this month.
- June 2009—Automated reviews of black and white issues
- August or September 2009—Complex reviews for DRG validation
- August or September 2009—Complex review for coding errors
- Fiscal year 2010, which begins October 1, 2009—Complex reviews for durable medical equipment (DME) medical necessity
- Calendar year 2010—Complex reviews for medical necessity
- August 2009—Automated reviews of black and white issues
- October or November 2009—Complex reviews for DRG validation
- October or November 2009—Complex review for coding errors
- Fiscal year 2010—Complex reviews for DME medical necessity
- Calendar year 2010—Complex reviews for medical necessity
Although the schedule calls for automated reviews as early as this month, any issue a RAC reviews must be vetted through the CMS’ “Issue Review Board.” In addition, RACs must post the approved issues to their Web sites before the reviews can begin.
“Use the time wisely to continue performing your own internal vulnerability audits and ensure that all of your policies and procedures are up-to-date. Consider this a little extra time to get your facility ready for those appeals,” says Tanja Twist, MBA/HCM, director of patient financial services at Methodist Hospital of Southern California.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Recovery Auditor Report!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Searched
