Q&A: RACs and Physician Offices
Recovery Auditor Report, June 25, 2009
Q. Our Midwestern physician practice that has more than 30 physicians. Are physician offices “vulnerable” or on the radar for RACs?
A: Yes, they are vulnerable. In addition, CMS has stated that when a RAC denies a hospital stay or service for medical necessity, the associated physician services would also be subject to denial.
Editor’s note: Tanja Twist, director of Patient Financial Services at Methodist Hospital of Southern California answered the previous question. She will also be speaking in the upcoming HCPro audio conference, “Medicare Appeals: Practical and Compliant Procedures for Overturning Denials,” as well as at the upcoming conference, “Medicare Compliance Forum: A Strategic Approach to RACs, Observation Status and the Role of Physician Advisors,” which will be held in Atlanta this October.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Note from Hugh
- CMS seeks comment on quality measures
- Note from the instructor: OIG report on usage of financial liability "G" modifiers
- Recent Recovery Auditor activity
- The week in Medicare updates
- Remind your workforce members to ’zip their lips’ when it comes to patient privacy
- HIPAA Q&A: Receiving faxed HEDIS requests
- CMS releases new QAPI resources
- Documentation of medical necessity drives successful RA appeals
- CMS says it's not too late to avoid payment adjustments
- E-mailed
-
- Note from the instructor: OIG report on usage of financial liability "G" modifiers
- Q/A: How do we report therapy G codes and modifiers for multiple therapies?
- HIPAA Q&A: Receiving faxed HEDIS requests
- CMS says it's not too late to avoid payment adjustments
- FDA makes new proposal related to C. diff and other threatening pathogens
- Shorter work week for interns may compromise patient safety
- Tip: Understand the three-day rule
- CMS releases new ICD-10 FAQs
- Demand a code for demand myocardial infarction
- Eyes see more ICD-10-CM codes because of laterality
- Searched
