Tip: Ask the right questions to ensure an effective admissions review program
Recovery Auditor Report, April 16, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Recovery Auditor Report!
Are you certain your admissions review program is as effective as it needs to be so you can avoid errors that would result in denials in an audit? Robert Corrato, MD, MBA, founder, president, and CEO of Executive Health Resources suggests you ask the following pointed questions to ensure you keep your admissions review accountable:
- Does your utilization review (UR) plan reflect a compliant process to meet the UR standards of the Conditions of Participation?
- Is there valid and documented physician medical necessity decision-making occurring?
- Are you following guidance put forth by CMS contractors?
- Is the UR staff appropriately meeting its daily operational admission screening criteria accountabilities? Is the UR staff incorrectly applying or going outside of the strict application of screening criteria?
- Is there ongoing education for UR staff in the use of screening criteria?
- Is there inter-rater reliability testing and quality assurance (QA) of screening criteria review by UR staff?
- Are UR screening criteria being applied to all Medicare beneficiaries in the hospital?
- Are admission review results documented in an auditable fashion and placed within the patient chart?
- Are secondary physician review determinations based upon the evaluation of regulatory guidance?
- Is there communication between the physician making the secondary physician review determination and the treating physician?
- Is there continuing education of physicians making secondary physician review determinations to ensure application of up-to-date clinical evidence and regulatory guidance?
- Is there inter-rater reliability and QA testing of the secondary physician review?
- Does the chart documentation reflect the secondary physician review determination and the process?
- Is there a process to ensure that the physician order is consistent with the admission status determination?
- Is there a process to ensure that the treating physician, hospital, and beneficiary are aware of final claim status before patient discharge?
Editor’s note: Robert Corrato, MD, MBA, is founder, president, and CEO of Executive Health Resources. This tip was adapted from “Monitor One-Day Stays Under RAC Scrutiny,” one of the many sessions presented at the Recovery Audit Contractor Defense Summit held in March. To listen to this presentation and others available from the RAC Defense Summit, visit HCMarketplace.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Recovery Auditor Report!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Searched
