Accurate edits return $$$
Patient Access Weekly Advisor, March 25, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Access Weekly Advisor!
By Vince Arencibia and Julie Souder
Many companies offer various services and ideas on how to improve revenue. Most, if not all, concentrate their efforts on the front-end registration process, dealing with eligibility, making sure the patients have enough insurance coverage, collection of co-pays, etc. All these procedures are important, good practices to follow and are essential to a good revenue cycle program.
One vital step in the revenue cycle program tends to be ignored or is inadequate. – proper setup and use of a scrubbing system. In order to have a clean claim, there are a few components dealing with systems and personnel that need to exist. A good, reliable scrubber system needs to be in place, the billers need to know how to use it, understand the information the scrubber provides, and, most of all, know how to resolve claims issues presented by the scrubber.
Companies spend hours on research and development concentrating on how well the electronic file is built so the insurance company will accept it. However, even though it is an important step as part of claim submission, how accurate is the information within the file? What if you do not have electronic file submission established for all the carriers, and paper claim submissions need to a review?
Editor’s note: To read the full story, go to the Patient Access Resource Center.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Access Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
-
Recovery Auditor Report
The Recovery Auditor Report is a free biweekly e-newsletter of useful tips and strategies to get you prepared for the...
-
Medicare Update for CAHs
Medicare Update for CAHs is a free bi-weekly ezxne that provides specialized information for our CAH (critical access...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Searched