Tip: Stay on top of common coding pitfalls
The RAC Report, December 24, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to The RAC Report!
Although coding denials did not remain the focus by the end of the demonstration project, and medically unnecessary settings appeared to have taken its place, accurate coding will continue to be one of the areas the permanent RACs will review as part of their continuing audits. Therefore, a good proactive program that ensures accurate coding and appropriate medical settings and services is essential.
The DRGs/procedure codes listed below were the most frequently cited for coding errors:
-
DRG 186–187—Pleural effusion with complication/comorbidities(CC) or major CC (MCC)
-
86.22—Debridement
-
DRG 813—Coagulation disorders
-
DRG 870–871—Septicemia
-
54.51 and 54.50—Lysis of adhesions
-
DRGs 981–989—For operating room procedures unrelated to the principal diagnosis
The DRGs listed below were most frequently associated with medical necessity and one-, two-, and three-day admissions denials:
-
DRG 551—Medical back problems
-
DRG 313—Chest pain
-
DRGs 377–379—Gastrointestinal hemorrhage with MCC, CC or without CC/MCC
-
DRGs 640–641—Nutritional and miscellaneous metabolic disorders with MCC or without MCC (e.g. dehydration)
-
DRG 291–293—Heart failure and shock with MCC, with CC or without CC/MCC (e.g. congestive heart failure)
-
DRG 689–690—Kidney and urinary tract infections with MCC or without MCC
-
DRG 682–684—Renal failure with MCC, with CC or without CC/MCC
-
DRG 811–812—Red blood cell disorders with MCC or without MCC
-
DRG 286–287—Circulatory disorders except AMI, with cardiac catheterization with MCC or without MCC
-
DRG 264—Other circulatory system operating room procedures
-
DRG 190–192—Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with MCC, with CC or without CC/MCC
-
DRG 166–168—Other respiratory system operating room.procedures with MCC, with CC or without CC/MCC (e.g. transbronchial lung biopsy)
-
DRG 222–227—Cardiac defibrillator implantations with or without cardiac catheterization
This list is not all-inclusive. Any DRGs, diagnoses, procedure codes, or medical necessity issues that have been identified as problems for the hospital should be included in proactive reviews for documentation improvement and consistent coding compliance.
Editor’s note: This tip is excerpted from HCPro, Inc.’s new book, The HIM Director's Guide to Recovery Audit Contractors, by Jean S. Clark, RHIA. For more information on the book, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to The RAC Report!
Comments
0 comments on “Tip: Stay on top of common coding pitfalls ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Q/A: Correct use of modifier -PT
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- "Wall fountains" may be spreading Legionnaires to patients, visitors
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Searched
