CMS RAC Open Door forum
Patient Access Weekly Advisor, November 19, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Access Weekly Advisor!
During the November 12 RAC Open Door Forum for Part A providers, CMS announced its intent to do the following with the permanent RAC program:
- Minimize hassles for providers. This includes limiting the volume of medical records RACs may request, and allowing RACs to look back three years instead of four. In addition, CMS is requiring RACs accept imaged records on CD/DVD.
- Maximize transparency. Among other steps, CMS has made it mandatory for RACS to have a Web site showing status of every claim by 2010, as well as send out detailed letters to providers reviewing results. The Web sites will also post types of audits as well as vulnerabilities.
- Maximize accuracy. CMS has required RACs to have medical directors and certified coders (i.e., coders with CCF, CCA, CCSP, CPC, CPC-H, or CRNC credentials).
In addition, during the call, CMS recommended providers take certain steps to prepare for the permanent RAC program. Suggested steps include the following:
- Review and understand all documents from the RAC demonstration
- Review all findings by permanent RACs once the program begins
- Review all current OIG reports at www.oig.hhs.gov/reports.asp
- Review the information on the CMS Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) Web site at www.cms.hhs.gov/cert
- Put in place an internal audit program
CMS also confirmed that the only two types of claims that are not open for review by RACs are HMO Medicare (Part C) and prescription drug (Part D) claims.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Access Weekly Advisor!
Comments
0 comments on “CMS RAC Open Door forum ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Correctly bill ancillary bedside procedures in addition to the room rate
- Searched
