CMS RAC Open Door forum update
The RAC Report, November 13, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to The RAC Report!
-
Minimize hassles for providers. This includes limiting the volume of medical records RACs may request, and allowing RACs to look back three years instead of four.In addition, CMS is requiring RACs accept imaged records on CD/DVD.
-
Maximize transparency. Among other steps, CMS has made it mandatory for RACS to have a Web site showing status of every claim by 2010, as well as send out detailed letters to providers reviewing results. The Web sites will also post types of audits as well as vulnerabilities.
-
Maximize accuracy. CMS has required RACs to have medical directors and certified coders (i.e., coders with CCF, CCA, CCSP, CPC, CPC-H, or CRNC credentials).
In addition, during the call, CMS recommended providers take certain steps to prepare for the permanent RAC program. Suggested steps include the following:
-
Review and understand all documents from the RAC demonstration
-
Review all findings by permanent RACs once the program begins
-
Review all current OIG reports at www.oig.hhs.gov/reports.asp
-
Review the information on the CMS Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) Web site at www.cms.hhs.gov/cert
-
Put in place an internal audit program
CMS will be holding a special RAC Open Door Forum for Part B providers Thursday, November 13, at 2:00 p.m., ET. If you missed the similar call for Part A providers November 12, a recording will be available on the CMS Web site beginning November 19.
Tip: If you plan on dialing in for the RAC Open Door Forum call for Part B providers on November 13, do so early. You may dial in as early as 1:45 p.m. ET. The November 12 call reached maximum capacity well before 2:00 p.m. ET.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to The RAC Report!
Comments
0 comments on “CMS RAC Open Door forum update ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched
