SNEAK PEEK: Be prepared for ABN changes
Patient Access Weekly Advisor, November 12, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Access Weekly Advisor!
More than a year after several rounds of review on proposed revisions to existing Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) Forms ABN-G and ABN-L, CMS published revised Form CMS-R-131.
As with the prior ABNs, the revised ABN is designed for use by hospitals, physicians, and certain other furnishers of healthcare services (“healthcare providers”) to notify Medicare beneficiaries when outpatient services are expected to be denied, primarily in the following circumstances:
- The services fail to meet Medicare’s medical necessity guidelines
- The services are screening services that are provided more frequently than Medicare provides a benefit for
- The services are custodial in nature
In order to be effective, such notice must occur prior to the performance of these services. This protects beneficiaries from unexpected financial liability. The provisions in Medicare law that require such protections are referred to as the “limitation on liability” provisions. Noncoverage most commonly arises with respect to diagnostic services (lab tests, imaging services, etc.). In such cases, the diagnostic information on the physician order does not support the medical necessity of the services ordered.
For the full story, see the article on the Patient Access Resource Center coming in December.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Access Weekly Advisor!
Comments
0 comments on “SNEAK PEEK: Be prepared for ABN changes ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Correctly bill ancillary bedside procedures in addition to the room rate
- Searched
