Key differences in nationwide rollout
The RAC Report, October 16, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to The RAC Report!
Now that you know which RAC will come to your facility, it’s time to prepare for some changes. CMS revamped the program after the three-year demonstration project, and providers can expect to see the changes reflected in the nationwide permanent program.
Chief among them are:
RAC medical director.
Demonstration RACs: Not required
Permanent RACs: Mandatory
Coding experts.
Demonstration RACs: Optional
Permanent RACs: Mandatory
Credentials of reviewers provided upon request.
Demonstration RACs: Not required
Permanent RACs: Mandatory
Discussion with CMD regarding claim denials if requested.
Demonstration RACs: Not required
Permanent RACs: Mandatory
AC validation process.
Demonstration RACs: Optional
Permanent RACs: Limited
External validation process.
Demonstration RACs: Not required
Permanent RACs: Mandatory
RAC must pay back the contingency fee if the claim is overturned on appeal.
Demonstration RACs: Only required if claim is overturned on the first level of appeals
Permanent RACs: Required if claim is overturned at all levels of appeals
Maximum look back date.
Demonstration RACs: None
Permanent RACs: October 1, 2007
RACs allowed to review claims in current fiscal year.
Demonstration RACs: No
Permanent RACs: Yes
RACs solely for MSP.
Demonstration RACs: Yes
Permanent RACs: No
RAC claim status Web page.
Demonstration RACs: Not required
Permanent RACs: By January 2010
Limits on number of medical records requested.
Demonstration RACs: Optional. Each RACs set own limit
Permanent RACs: Mandatory. CMS will establish uniform limits.
Editor’s note: For more differences in the permanent program, see the next edition of The RAC Report October 30, 2008.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to The RAC Report!
Comments
0 comments on “Key differences in nationwide rollout ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Q/A: Correct use of modifier -PT
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- "Wall fountains" may be spreading Legionnaires to patients, visitors
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Searched
