Contingency fees announced
The RAC Report, October 16, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to The RAC Report!
CMS announced the new Medicare Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs) for its permanent nationwide program last week. Later in the week, they announced how much money they will make from provider overpayments.
The RACs get paid “contingency fees” based on the amount of the improper payments they correct for both overpayments and underpayments.
“Each RAC's contingency fee is established during contract negotiations with CMS and, as such, the contingency fee varies for each RAC,” CMS said.
The contingency fees breakdown as follows:
- Region A: 12.45%
- Region B: 12.50%
- Region C: 9%
- Region D: 9.49%
The four contractors and their selected regions are:
- Diversified Collection Services, Inc. of Livermore, CA: Region A, initially working in Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and New York.
- CGI Technologies and Solutions, Inc. of Fairfax, VA: Region B, initially working in Michigan, Indiana and Minnesota.
- Connolly Consulting Associates, Inc. of Wilton, CT: Region C, initially working in South Carolina, Florida, Colorado and New Mexico.
- HealthDataInsights (HDI), Inc. of Las Vegas, NV: Region D, initially working in Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Arizona.
Connolly and HDI worked on the initial RAC demonstration project that spanned over six states, collected more than $900 million in overpayments, and returned nearly $38 million in underpayments to healthcare providers, according to a CMS press release.
For a further breakdown of the contingency fees and to learn the addresses of the four contractors, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to The RAC Report!
Comments
0 comments on “Contingency fees announced ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched
