Facilities must be prepared for identity theft
Patient Access Weekly Advisor, October 15, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Access Weekly Advisor!
Effective November 1, hospitals must have a plan in place to detect, mitigate, and prevent red flags that signal potential identity theft, according to the Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (final rule).
There was confusion over whether the rule, which is primarily geared toward financial institutions and other lenders, also applied to healthcare providers. However, although the rule doesn’t specifically reference hospitals, it does imply that they may fit the legislation’s extremely broad definition of "creditor" because they permit a deferred payment of certain ongoing accounts.
Essentially, providers become "creditors" when they establish payment plan. Supplementary information published with the rule states the following: Creditors in the healthcare field may be at risk of medical identity theft (i.e., identity theft for the purpose of obtaining medical services) and, therefore, must identify red flags that reflect this risk.
Examples of red flags could include, but are not limited to, any of the following:
- A mismatch between an individual’s address according to his insurance policy and what appears on his driver’s license
- A photograph on a driver’s license or other ID that doesn’t match the individual presenting it
- An address provided that is a P.O. box or mail drop
- The telephone number provided is for a pager or answering service
To view the red flag rule, which was published in the November 9, 2007 Federal Register, visit this government Web site. For illustrative examples that hospitals can use when developing an identity theft prevention program, refer to Supplement A to Appendix J of the rule. Also refer to the World Privacy Forum Web site to view its latest report titled "Red Flag and Address Discrepancy Requirements: Suggestions for Health Care Providers," released September 24.
Click here to view the report.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Access Weekly Advisor!
Comments
0 comments on “Facilities must be prepared for identity theft ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Correctly bill ancillary bedside procedures in addition to the room rate
- Searched
