Patient access managers must be ready for RACs
Patient Access Weekly Advisor, September 24, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Access Weekly Advisor!
The “better late than never” theory will not work in a defense against Medicare’s Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs). And that certainly goes for patient access managers.
Access managers must prepare for RACs now, says Tanja M. Twist, director of patient financial services at Methodist Hospital in Arcadia, CA.
“I strongly urge hospitals to take advantage of this lull in the RAC process to perform gap analyses within their facilities to find their areas of risk before the RAC does,” says Twist, who directs the patient access manager at her facility. “Anything hospitals can find and fix on their own will result in not only lowering the number of RAC denials, but also will reduce your vulnerability for a false claims suit should the RAC identify a trend in your data.”
But what specifically do patient access managers need to anticipate and start fixing now to help their facilities defend against a RAC?
“From an access point of view, hospitals should be performing analyses on their one-day-stays vs. observation cases and medical necessity denials,” Twist says. “In analyzing the data, they will likely identify several key admitting physicians who are driving the problem accounts. Using a physician champion, hospitals can work with their physicians to reverse the trend. Again, it is important to find and fix these deficiencies before the RAC does.”
For more tips for patient access managers to become “RAC ready” from Twist, please see the next edition of Patient Access Weekly Advisor Wednesday, October 1.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Access Weekly Advisor!
Comments
0 comments on “Patient access managers must be ready for RACs ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Correctly bill ancillary bedside procedures in addition to the room rate
- Searched
