TIP: Don't forget about MSPs in RACs
Patient Access Weekly Advisor, September 24, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Access Weekly Advisor!
Though CMS officially terminated the Medicare Recovery Audit Contractor Medicare Secondary Payer program (MSP RACs) after the demonstration project in March, patient access managers cannot overlook MSP compliance when it comes to the permanent RAC program.
The MSP RACs netted the government $12.7 million in false claims, not enough to continue the MSP RACs but enough to weave it back into the overall permanent project. Tanja M. Twist, director of patient financial services at Methodist Hospital in Arcadia, CA, sees the MSP RACs making a comeback. Twist is the finance chair for the American Association of Healthcare Administrative Management (AAHAM) who has fought Congress on Capitol Hill for better transparency and answers to concerns with RACs on behalf of hospitals.
“I would not be surprised if they bring that back,” she says. “Make sure you’re watching and monitoring that. They’ll keep digging until they find money, even though not much was there with the MSP RACs. It doesn’t mean you should not be focusing on it.”
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Access Weekly Advisor!
Comments
0 comments on “TIP: Don't forget about MSPs in RACs ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Correctly bill ancillary bedside procedures in addition to the room rate
- Searched
