California Hospital Association questions CMS numbers from demonstration project
Recovery Auditor Report, September 4, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Recovery Auditor Report!
As we reported in the last edition of The RAC Report, CMS released its “Summary Evaluation Report” on the RAC demonstration project, where it said it identified $992.7 million in overpayments.
The California Hospital Association released a memorandum to HCPro Inc. that cites “several serious concerns” about the information in the CMS report, such as:
- The appeals data is incomplete, and significantly understates the volume and impact of provider appeal activity. The current report does not include appeals at the first level of appeal or other appeals in process with providers.
- The total appeals volume data is premature and misleading. Nearly one half (47%) of the reported “overpayments” were recouped during the last three months of the program (January 1, 2008 through March 27, 2008). This significant portion of total funds collected was still subject to appeal at the time of the report (May 1, 2008).
For more on the California Hospital Association’s take on CMS RAC numbers, please see the next edition of The RAC Report on September 18.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Recovery Auditor Report!
Comments
0 comments on “California Hospital Association questions CMS numbers from demonstration project ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Correctly bill ancillary bedside procedures in addition to the room rate
- Searched
