Things you need to know about RACs
Recovery Auditor Report, August 19, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Recovery Auditor Report!
Editor’s note: The following are some numbers, facts and other important information about Medicare’s Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) program:
Show the government the money: The RACs corrected more than $1 billion of Medicare improper payments from 2005 through March 27, 2008. Roughly 96% of the improper payments ($992.7 million) were overpayments collected from providers, while the remaining 4% ($37.8 million) were underpayments repaid to providers.
Inpatient is No. 1: Of the overpayments, 85% were collected from inpatient hospital providers, 6% from inpatient rehabilitation facilities, and 4% from outpatient hospital providers.
No contest: Providers chose to appeal only 14% of the RAC decisions. Of all the RAC overpayment determinations, only 4.6% were overturned on appeal. However, a memo from the California Hospital Association obtained by HCPro, Inc. says "the appeals data is incomplete, and significantly understates the volume and impact of provider appeal activity. The current report does not include appeals at the first level of appeal or other appeals in process with providers."
MSP flaws: $12.7 million was returned to the government through overpayments on Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) RACs.
Appeal payback: Under the demonstration project, the RAC only needed to pay back the contingency fee if the claim was overturned at the first level. However, under the permanent RAC, the payback of the contingency fee would be at all levels.
Helpful Web sites: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/RAC; and www.aha.org/aha/issues/RAC
Sources: William Malm, ND, RN, president of Health Revenue Integrity Services, Inc.; CMS
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Recovery Auditor Report!
Comments
0 comments on “Things you need to know about RACs ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Correctly bill ancillary bedside procedures in addition to the room rate
- Searched
