Full report on 2009 OPPS proposed rule
Patient Access Weekly Advisor, July 16, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Access Weekly Advisor!
Currently, CMS pays for emergency visits provided in Type B EDs, which offer emergency-level services but are not open 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, at the same rate as a nonemergency visit to an outpatient department.
CMS data now shows that most Type B emergency visits are more expensive than clinic visits, but are less expensive than Type A ED visits. The proposed rule creates four new APCs for Type B ED visits, paid based on claims data from these providers.
CMS has also proposed to pay for the most intensive emergency visits using a single APC on the premise that costs for these are similar in both Type A and B emergency departments.
Changes in imaging services payments The OPPS proposed rule proposes a single payment for certain multiple imaging services when provided in one session. These include:
• Ultrasound
• Computed tomography (CT) and computed tomographic angiography (CTA) without contrast
• CT and CTA with contrast
• Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) without contrast
• MRI and MRA with contrast
“This is not good,” says Glenn Krauss, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, an independent consultant in Milton, WI. “You used to get paid for two modalities [in multiple imaging services] and you got discounted on one, but now you’re only going to get paid for one. [CMS] is telling us to be more efficient and think twice about ordering. What they’re doing is practicing medicine.”
CMS has proposed these changes in an effort to eliminate unnecessary tests, and while Krauss says that this problem exists, he asks “but what happens if it [a test] is necessary?” He also foresees the changes posing a lose-lose choice for radiology departments. To run efficiently under the new rule, radiology departments must change their ordering patterns—but doing so may catch CMS’ attention, Krauss says.
The 2009 OPPS proposed rule is scheduled to be published in the July 18 Federal Register.
Comments on the proposed rule will be accepted through September 2. CMS will respond to comments in a final rule that it expects to release on or before November 1. Should the changes become final, they will become effective as of January 1, 2009.
Editor’s note: To view the OPPS/ASC proposed rule for 2009, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Access Weekly Advisor!
Comments
0 comments on “Full report on 2009 OPPS proposed rule ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Correctly bill ancillary bedside procedures in addition to the room rate
- Searched
