News and briefs: Number of slots for residents could significantly decrease
Residency Program Connection, October 25, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Residency Program Connection!
There would be 22,000 fewer positions for resident s and 1,750 fewer training programs if the government cuts 50% of Indirect GME Reimbursement payments, according to a survey conducted by the ACGME.
As the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction looks to reduce federal spending over the next 10 years, one line item it has its eyes on is Medicare reimbursement for GME. According to the ACGME, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission has indicated that 50% of the indirect reimbursement is not “empirically justified.”
The ACGME survey asked designated institutional officials how federal funding would affect their institutions’ programs and positions. They were given three different funding scenarios: level funding, reduction by 33%, and reduction by 50%.
If funding from the government remains the same, 61% or respondents would keep the same number of core and subspecialty positions. As for programs, 77% would keep the same number of core programs and 62% would sponsor the same number of subspecialty programs. If the government reduces funding by 33%, 68% of respondents would slightly or significantly reduce the number of core residency positions and 60% would reduce the number of subspecialty positions. At a 50% funding reduction, 82% would slightly or significantly reduce the number of core positions and 76% would reduce the number of subspecialty ones.
The ACGME used survey results to estimate how many positions and programs would be lost among survey respondents’ institutions. With a 33% reduction there would be 1,136 fewer programs and 13,662 fewer positions. For a 50% reduction, it would be 1,749 fewer programs and 22,411 fewer positions. At least 12 states would lose more than 500 positions. To read more survey results, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Residency Program Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Searched
