Ask the expert: What is the coordinator's role in screening applications?
Residency Program Connection, October 13, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Residency Program Connection!
The answer to this question is, “it depends.” The program director determines the process for reviewing applications. Program directors tend to pick one of the two following ways of reviewing applications:
- Program directors utilize the program coordinator for the initial screening of applicants. The program director gives the coordinator a set of criteria that he or she will use to weed out those who do not meet minimum standards. Measures may include USMLE scores, receipt of medical school transcripts, and a set number of letters of recommendation. The program coordinator sends those applicants who make the cut on for a second review by the program director and/or application review committee.
- Only the program director reviews all applications and determines which applicants will continue in the process.
Most program directors chose method 1, following up with discussions with the program coordinator to compare notes and impressions. During the second review of the applications, program directors, faculty, and coordinators thoroughly review the application and supporting documents to ensure compliance with program standards.
Send the applications to those reviews via ERAS. Faculty members will receive an e-mail from ERAS indicating that there are applications to review and provides a list of and a link to those applications.
This week’s question and answer are from The Complete Residency Program Management Guideby Ruth H. Nawotniak, MS, C-TAGME. Come see Ruth present at the 4th Annual Residency Program Management Workshop.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Residency Program Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched
