Tip of the month: Review the PIF with residents
Residency Program Connection, October 13, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Residency Program Connection!
It is essential that the residents are aware of and agree with the PIF’s content. The ACGME issues many citations based on the information residents give the site visitor. Typically, the citations occur because of one of the following two reasons:
- The residents do not confirm information contained in the PIF
- The residents provide answers contrary to what is written in the PIF
One month before the site visit, sit down with the residents who will meet with the site visitor and review the PIF with them. Residents may not always understand the nuances of program management or residency review committee (RRC) requirements and how the program administers and meets them. Consider this a great opportunity for discussing those topics.
Additionally, the program director should clarify any questions the residents have about the
PIF’s content. Residents should have a crystal-clear understanding of your responses and the rationale behind each.
Never coach residents on how they should answer questions posed by the site visitor. However,
it is incumbent on the program director to ensure that the residents understand the following points:
- How the accreditation process works
- What role the PIF plays
- What role the site visitor plays
- What happens to the PIF after the site visitor leaves
- The kinds of questions the site visitor may be asked
- The content of the PIF
This week’s tip is from Program Information Form Made Simple, by Jeri L. Whitten, C-TAGME. Come see Jeri’s presentation about PIF and site visit preparation at the 4th Annual Residency Program Management Workshop Oct. 22-23 in Atlanta, GA.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Residency Program Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- 2010 ICD-9 code updates now available online
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Master modifiers to ensure accurate reimbursement
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Don’t be scared into silence: Affiliation letter safeguards allow you to disclose more
- Understand the H1N1 Flu and how to code it
- E-mailed
-
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Providers report first RAC denials in Florida, South Carolina
- Revised MS.1.20 'huge improvement', out for comment again
- Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations, December 2009
- Develop effective strategies for your breach notification response program
- Searched
