Institute of Medicine releases suggested changes to duty hour standards
Residency Program Connection, December 9, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Residency Program Connection!
Last week, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) released a report calling for several changes to the ACGME duty hour regulations. The report, Resident Duty Hours: Enhancing Sleep, Supervision, and Safety, advocates for protected sleep time for residents, increased supervision of residents, and more effective hand-off processes, all of which could cost health care organizations as much as $1.7 billion to implement.
The organization does not call for cuts to the current “80-hour averaged over four weeks” rule. Instead, it proposes the following modifications:
- During 30-hour shifts, residents should admit patients for up to 16 hours, have 5 hours of uninterrupted sleep between 10 p.m. and 8 a.m., and spend the remaining hours on transitional and educational activities. (Currently, residents can admit patients for up to 24 hours and spend the remaining six hours on transitional and educational activities).
- If there is no protected sleep time, residents’ shifts should only be 16 hours. .
- Time off between shifts should be changed from 10 hours after a shift to the following: 10 hours after day shift, 12 hours after night shift, and after an extended duty of 30 hours, residents get 14 hours, and they can’t return to work until 6 a.m. the following day.
- Mandatory time off should be increased from four to five days per month; residents should get one day off per week (no longer averaged over four weeks), and one 48-hour period off every month.
- New duty hour rules should apply to all internal and external moonlighting.
Several organizations, including medical associations and consumer groups, are responding to the IOM’s suggestions. Although many applaud the report, some are not in favor with the findings. While consumer organizations call for federal monitoring of duty hours, some medical socities raise concerns that work hour restrictions reduce residents' educational time. For summaries and links to various organizations’ statements, see our post on Residency Manager Blog.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Residency Program Connection!
Comments
0 comments on “Institute of Medicine releases suggested changes to duty hour standards ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched
