Focus on previous citations, concerns, and comments during site visit preparation
Residency Program Connection, December 2, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Residency Program Connection!
The following is an excerpt from, Insider’s Guide to the ACGME Site Visit, Second Edition (published by HCPro, Inc.) by Kathryn Andolsek, MD, MPH, and Shepard Cohen.
When preparing for a site visit, first focus on the review committee’s (RC) previous citations and your program’s responses. Site visitors and RC members look at these elements first. They want to be assured that you accepted their previous letters seriously and have been aggressive in implementing corrective actions. This information will help you anticipate the site visitor’s first concerns. However, your improvements can’t stop there. Don’t simply fix past citations. Demonstrate substantial compliance with all the other requirements. Turn some of these into “best practices.”
Second, focus on the results of your own annual self-review program evaluations. What were the major one or two concerns you identified each year? How did you analyze the issues, create action plans and timelines, and use these to improve that area within your residency program. How have you measured your success? What has been your progress in those areas?
This information will allow you to demonstrate that your program leaders identified weaknesses leading to steps to strengthen those areas. For issues that you have not yet addressed, you can anticipate the site visitor’s questions and can then demonstrate your program’s commitment to making the necessary improvements. It is better that you identify a concern, rather than the site visitor finding it from reading the PIF or from interviews.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Residency Program Connection!
Comments
0 comments on “Focus on previous citations, concerns, and comments during site visit preparation ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- 2010 ICD-9 code updates now available online
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- Master modifiers to ensure accurate reimbursement
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Don’t be scared into silence: Affiliation letter safeguards allow you to disclose more
- Understand the H1N1 Flu and how to code it
- E-mailed
-
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Q/A: Billing for DME
- Revised MS.1.20 'huge improvement', out for comment again
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Providers report first RAC denials in Florida, South Carolina
- Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations, December 2009
- Searched
