Study: Number, cost of U.S. hospital infections on the rise
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, September 26, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
A new study of inpatient data from United States hospitals found that the number of infections caused by the Staphylococcus aureus bacterium increased by more than 7% each year from 1998 to 2003. As a result, the economic burden to hospitals rose by nearly 12% annually, according to the study published in the November 1 Clinical Infectious Diseases.
Staph aureus is a significant cause of ailments from minor skin infections to life-threatening diseases such as pneumonia and meningitis. In 1998, U.S. hospitals reported more than 250,000 staph infections, with more than 7% of those patients dying. By 2003, hospitals reported nearly 390,000 infections.
The study's authors say one possible reason for the increase of infections is the documented increase in the "superbug" methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Another reason could be that physicians and hospitals have improved their detection and reporting of infections.
The study also found that the staph-related in-hospital mortality rate dropped by nearly 5% each year, which may be due to the introduction of stricter infection control programs and more aggressive treatment of MRSA infections.
Hospital expenditures associated with staph infections increased from $8.7 billion in 1998 to $14.5 billion in 2003, the study found. This includes extended length of stay and additional surgery, medications, lab tests, and radiologic studies.
Visit http://www.idsociety.org for more information on the study.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Searched
