Wrong site surgery rates hold steady
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, Providence Journal, August 15, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
The rate of wrong site, wrong patient, and wrong procedure errors remains steady after years of concerted efforts by hospitals and The Joint Commission to address the problem, according to a Providence Journal article.
As a result, hospitals are reviewing their policies and The Joint Commission is mulling changes to its Univeral Protocol. Part of the problem is the complexity of surgery, according to the article. A small error earlier in the process, such as reversing an X-ray, can lead to serious patient harm, even if all other safety steps are followed correctly.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Searched
