Joint Commission rescinds interim rule on MM.4.10
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, April 18, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
The Joint Commission has rescinded the interim rule on Medication Management standard 4.10, element of performance 1 (MM.4.10, EP 1). The change means the rule as written takes effect, and a pharmacist must check first-dose medication for all patients in the emergency department, according to a Joint Commission memorandum published by the
Instituted on January 1, the interim rule had allowed hospitals to use a retrospective examination of first-dose medications. The change requires pharmacists to review all orders unless "unless a licensed independent practitioner controls the ordering, preparation, and administration of the medication; or in urgent situations when the resulting delay would harm the patient, including situations in which the patient experiences a sudden change in clinical status."
The ACEP opposes the change, saying it puts an unreasonable onus on emergency department personnel and will slow patient care, leading to bad outcomes. The ACEP has been in contact with The Joint Commission about the change and has been told the accrediting body will review the standard and the criticisms against it in the next several weeks.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Searched
