NQF releases patient safety framework
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, February 15, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
The National Quality Forum (NQF) on Tuesday released a standardized classification system for patient safety data that the organization claims will lead to a better understanding of medical errors.
The Patient Safety Event Taxonomy (PSET) will enable interoperability of reporting systems and comparability of information across systems and over time, the NQF said in a release. The JCAHO developed the PSET with the assistance of a work group comprised of representatives of provider and health professional organizations and the federal government.
The PSET provides a structure to categorize and analyze occurrences that threaten patient safety (i.e., any risk, event, error, hazardous condition, or set of circumstances that has harmed or could harm patients), according to the NQF. Hundreds of entities-including federal and state agencies, insurance companies, and individual healthcare providers-collect information about healthcare safety, including details of instances in which patient safety is endangered.
The NQF endorsed PSET in August 2005, granting it special legal status as a voluntary consensus standard. The executive summary and portions of the report, Standardizing a Patient Safety Taxonomy, are available here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A: Coding 'aspiration without pneumonia'
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
