Decision-sharing not always positive for patients
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, February 8, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
A new study shows that patients often have negative experiences when sharing in the decision-making process. The small sample study was published in The Annals of Family Medicine.
The study followed 125 decisions made in the cases of 18 patients. Of those, 62 involved shared decision making. According to the study, patients considered 56% of the experiences as negative.
The researchers also concluded that 40% of patients were not fully involved in the shared decisions.
To read the an abstract of the study, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A: Coding 'aspiration without pneumonia'
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
