JCAHO, QIOs, Medicare scrutinized in newspaper series
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, July 28, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Medicare's system of hospital oversight and cost control received tough scrutiny in a series published by the Washington Post. The three-part series, Published from July 24 to 26, questioned how Medicare controls costs and oversees quality improvement in the country's hospitals. With lax controls, hospitals that cause patient infections and other preventable problems receive Medicare funding for the extra procedures required. In effect, bad hospitals are rewarded, according to the Post.
The JCAHO was also taken to task in the piece, where the organization was criticized for being too lenient in its accreditation process. Quality improvement organizations (QIOs) were also criticized for their secrecy when dealing with patients and reluctance to support patient complaints with sanctions.
Officials from the JCAHO and the QIOs defended their records, saying the focus of their efforts is improvement in hospital systems, rather than punishing individual physicians or hospitals. By changing systems, they argued, hospitals will become safer for patients-and costs will decrease.
To read the first article in the series, click here. The other installments of the series and some graphics on the issue are listed on the Web page's sidebar.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A: Coding 'aspiration without pneumonia'
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
