JCAHO announces 2006 National Patient Safety Goals
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, June 2, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) released its 2006 National Patient Safety Goals on Tuesday. Two new requirements call for tighter control on "hand-offs" of patients between hospital departments and better labeling of medications in a perioperative setting.
The hand-off requirement would standardize the point of transfer between caregivers, with an emphasis on asking and answering questions to prevent communication errors.
The labeling requirement would tighten control over medications, containers and solutions in a perioperative setting for facilities with surgical or invasive services.
The JCAHO has also retired a requirement to ban concentrated electrolytes from patient care areas. A requirement on free-flow protection for patient-controlled analgesia pumps has also been retired. Both will now be added to the JCAHO's standards
Six "do not use" abbreviations have also been affirmed in the 2006 goals, but a clause requiring hospitals to add three in-house prohibited abbreviations has been deleted. The use of unauthorized abbreviations remains one of the largest areas of non-compliance in JCAHO surveys.
To read the JCAHO press release, click here. To see the complete list of 2006 NPSGs, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A: Coding 'aspiration without pneumonia'
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
