Study finds only half of surgery patients receive recommended antibiotics
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, February 24, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Although giving patients antibiotics before their operations is recommended to prevent surgical infections, only about half of patients undergoing major surgery actually receive them, according to Use of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Major Surgery, a study released on February 21.
Multiple medical groups have issued guidelines stating that patients undergoing major surgery should receive intravenous antibiotics one hour or less before the start of the operation, according to a Chicago Tribune article. Studies show that patients should stop the antibiotic within 24 hours after surgery so they do not develop resistance to it.
But Dale Bratzler, MD, president of the American Health Quality Association and lead author of the study, found that these guidelines are not always practiced. The study, published in the Archives of Surgery, found that all 34,000 Medicare patients Bratzler looked at were administered a prophylactic antibiotic and 93% received the right drug, but only 56% received it within one hour of their incision.
"If you give it too early or too late, it's like giving nothing," said John Segreti, MD, an infectious disease expert at Rush University Medical Center. "People don't understand that."
To read an abstract of the study in the Archives of Surgery, click here.
To read the complete Chicago Tribune article, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A: Coding 'aspiration without pneumonia'
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
