Massachusetts Nurses Association opposes Magnet Recognition program
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, December 17, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
The Massachusetts Nurses Association (MNA) opposes the Magnet recognition program for nursing services in hospitals, calling it the latest industry strategy to avoid safe nurse-to-patient ratios, according to a statement the group released November 17.
Many hospital and nursing administrators have recently embraced Magnet Recognition as a vehicle for boosting public confidence in their nursing care, improving retention of nursing staff, and increasing reimbursement for services by the federal government and private insurers, MNA claims.
However, the MNA views Magnet as "a pure marketing ploy that trades on the public's trust in nurses as a vehicle for burnishing the hospital's image." The MNA states that true quality of care can only be achieved when laws guarantee safe nurse-to-patient ratios, and when nurses are provided with the legally protected right to influence and improve their working conditions.
The statement likens Magnet Recognition to high-priced, consultant-driven programs that do not guarantee quality patient care or conditions that will protect nursing practice.
The nursing community has evaluated the effectiveness of voluntary accreditation programs, including the JCAHO, for years. The MNA calls JCAHO accreditation "a farce," as it does not provide true evaluation of the quality of care in hospitals.
To read the full position statement, visit http://www.massnurses.org/pubs/positions/magnet.htm.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Searched
