IOM report authors give healthcare improvements C+
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, November 9, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
The nation's healthcare system rates a C+ at best when it comes to cutting its medical error rate in half, according to authors of the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) 1999 report "To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System."
"If one of my kids came home from school with a C+, we'd have a stern talk about the need to do better," Robert Wachter, a medical expert at the University of California at San Francisco, and co-author of the institute's report told The Kansas City Star.
The IOM report estimated that between 44,000 and 98,000 Americans die each year from medical errors. The report prompted Congress to call for cutting the error rate in half, but the report's authors cite a lack of funding and national commitment as reasons for falling short of the goal five years later.
For example, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, which conducts medical safety research for the federal government, has a budget of only $60 million this year, said Lucian Leape, MD, a professor at the Harvard School of Public Health and a co-author of the report.
The IOM study said most medical errors resulted from basic flaws in the healthcare system, such as poor tracking of drugs and patient records. It recommended a national patient safety center, mandatory reporting of errors, a stronger focus on information technology, and the creation of a "culture of safety" focused on tracking, reporting, and taking steps to reduce errors.
The report's authors said many doctors and hospitals still resist attempts to create a "culture of safety."
Some health systems are taking steps to reduce medical errors, however. Douglas McCarthy, president of Issues Research, a Colorado-based health-care research firm, told The Kansas City Star about hospitals where teams of doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and technicians meet each day to review patient records and develop care plans.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Searched
