Hospitals are having a tough time complying with a JCAHO requirement that calls for hospitals to create standardize the abbreviations, acronyms, and symbols that staff and physicians should-and should not-use throughout the organization.
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, May 20, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Standardized abbreviations are the toughest patient safety goal to comply with
Hospitals are finding it most difficult to comply with a JCAHO requirement that calls for hospitals to create standardize the abbreviations, acronyms, and symbols that staff and physicians should-and should not-use throughout the organization.
Nearly 65% of hospitals that received a random unannounced survey from the JCAHO did not comply with the requirement (National Patient Safety Goal #2b). In addition, about 77% of hospitals that underwent their announced, triennial survey were in compliance with the goal, according to new statistics released by the JCAHO.
Hospitals also struggle with the JCAHO requirement to implement a surgical site marking process (goal 4b). Fewer than 69% of hospitals were in full compliance with the goal during unannounced surveys in 1993. Hospitals that underwent announced surveys fared much better with this goal, however; nearly 94% of them were found to be in full compliance with it.
Organizations appeared to have an easier time ensuring free-flow protection on general-use patient-controlled analgesia pumps (goal #5a), standardizing and limiting the number of drug concentrations (goal #3b), and testing clinical alarm systems (goal #6a). Organizations were in near-perfect compliance each of these goals last year.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Searched
