ED Diversion raises heart attack mortality
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, June 15, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Heart attack patients have a higher risk of dying within a year if the closest ED is on diversion as opposed to operating normally on the day they get sick, according to a Robert Wood Johnson-funded study that is the first of its kind, published in the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA).
"If you have 100 patients admitted to an emergency department with a heart attack, 29 of them are likely to die under normal operations," when the hospital was not on diversion at all that day, within the following year, says Yu-Chu Shen of the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, the report's principal author.
"But if [those] same 100 patients had a heart attack on a day when their closest hospital was on diversion for 12 hours or more, the number of patients who would die would go up to 32%. You're going to have an additional three deaths that are potentially avoidable if those patients had not been subject to longer diversion," Shen says.
Presumably, the additional deaths occurred because delays in treatment resulting from busier ED staff or increased transport times equated to greater heart muscle damage, greater oxygen deprivation or other adverse consequences.
Sources: HealthLeaders Media, JAMA
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for protein malnutrition
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Avoid the trap of probable diagnoses
- Searched
