HHS announces Final Rule on Meaningful Use
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, July 14, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced yesterday its Final Rule on Meaningful Use. The rule, intended to spell out exactly what will constitute healthcare parties' appropriate use of electronic health records, has been anticipated since the proposed rule was released in January. HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology David Blumenthal, and newly named CMS Administrator Don Berwick were on hand to make the announcement.
The Final Rule stipulates that those entities that are considered meaningful users in 2011 and 2012 will receive incentive payments. Based on comments concerning the proposed rule, HHS decreased the number of objectives that hospitals and physicians must meet. They have also divided the objectives into two sets: a core set, of which all must be met, and a menu set, of which five out of ten must be met. This addressed the concerns of many in the industry, who were worried the Final Rule would take an all-or-nothing approach.
The Meaningful Use requirements are a stipulation of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) of 2009. The act provides funding for the adoption of electronic health records.
To find more about the final rule, click here to see an explanation from its creators in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Q&A: Coding for protein malnutrition
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched
