APIC study: CLABSI still a problem in many hospitals
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, July 14, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Despite massive efforts over the past few years to reduce the rate of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLASBI), more than half of respondents to a survey by the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) indicate that the infections are still a problem at their facilities. The survey results were released during APIC's annual conference. Of the 2,075 respondents, most of whom were infection preventionists, about half cite lack of time able to be spent on prevention as a major reason CLABSIs continue to plague hospitals. This is because, according to the survey, most of their time is spent on surveillance or reporting.
As far as barriers to implementing best practices for prevention, respondents cited a lack of ability to enforce policies surrounding infection control and staff education. Additionally, respondents said a lack of strong leadership in the area is likely a reason that CLABSIs continue to remain an issue. Only 30% of respondents feel their leadership team would spend the money necessary to fight these types of infections.
Click here to read more from APIC.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Q&A: Coding for protein malnutrition
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched
