Reduce the risk of missing critical test results by redefining process, says new paper
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, May 26, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
The opportunity for a physician to miss an important test results has become more frequent as the number of tests ordered for each patient continues to climb. In order to ensure that physicians are receiving all of the test results they should be, and that any follow-up actions are taken, hospitals should consider incorporating a few best practices into their critical results processes, reports a story in American Medical News.
The story refers to a study published in a recent issue of The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. The paper suggests that hospitals decide on a set of critical results that warrant immediate attention, as a way of cutting through the volume of results. Additional suggestions include making physicians responsible for following up on test results (including possible follow-up with a patient's primary care physician), planning for what to do if the physician cannot be reached when test results are available, and creating a defined policy about the notification of patients about test results.
To read more from American Medical News, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Avoid the trap of probable diagnoses
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Q&A: Coding for protein malnutrition
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched
