From the Patient Safety Monitor Blog: AHA report says many hospitals will face fines for not complying with "meaningful use" in relation to EMRs
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, April 28, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
As part of legislation passed in 2009, all hospitals must be achieving "meaningful use" by 2015, or they may face penalties from the government. Meaningful use is a phrase that refers to the requirement that hospitals be "meaningful users" of health information technology.
To accomplish this, there are several aspects of an electronic medical record (EMR) for which hospitals are responsible for implementing. Medicare is providing incentive payments between fiscal years 2011 and 2016 for those facilities that do meet the requirements of meaningful use.
However, a new TrendWatch report, released recently by the American Hospital Association (AHA), shows that many hospitals will not be able to meet the requirements for meaningful use by 2015.
Click here to read more on the Patient Safety Monitor Blog.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Related Products
-
Briefings on The Joint Commission
Briefings on The Joint Commission will help you with all of your accreditation and survey preparation needs. Every month...
-
The CMS Survey Coordinator's Handbook
There is no reason to struggle with CMS requirements. HCPro has teamed up with former contracted CMS surveyor Jeff Coleman...
-
Stark Law, 2nd edition: A user's guide to achieving compliance
This updated version of HCPro's Stark Law best seller, first published in 2005—and now co-authored by former CMS Stark...
-
HCAHPS Basics: A Resource Guide for Healthcare Managers
HCAHPS spells worry for many hospitals. How will you ensure your hospital's HCAHPS survey data is in good light?
-
Handoff Communication: A Structured Approach to Transitions in Care
During this 90-minute Webcast, our expert speakers will discuss the best way to implement a standardized approach to handoff...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Avoid the trap of probable diagnoses
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Q&A: Coding for protein malnutrition
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched