California doctors suing state to ensure nurses have supervision when administering anesthesia
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, February 24, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's decision to opt out of a Medicare provision requiring the state's nurses to be supervised by physicians when administering anesthesia is being challenged by two physician organizations, reports American Medical News.
The California Medical Association and California Society of Anesthesiologists have filed a suit saying that patient safety will be put at risk by the change in practice. Previously, nurse anesthetists required supervisions by physicians when administering anesthesia, and the suit pushes this rule to go back into effect because the administration of anesthesia usually involves high-risk medications and procedures. Additionally, the suit alleges that the new law violates existing state law, which bans nurse anesthetists from administering these types of medications on his or her own.
However, Gov. Schwarzenegger decided to opt out of this rule in June 2009, which is allowed by Medicare, to save money but maintain the level of patient safety at CA hospitals. His reasoning, with which the California Hospital Association agrees, is that patients in rural areas often cannot wait for a physician to supervise a nurse anesthetist to administer anesthesia. Therefore, it is imperative for nurses trained in administering anesthesia be able to do so without supervision, these groups argue.
To read more from American Medical News, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: HIPAA-compliant phone messages
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Physician referral patterns ripe for scrutiny
- Dealing with data breaches
- Sneak Peek: Planning for homecare can reduce avoidable readmissions
- Ask the expert: Should medical staff bylaws address employment contracts and exclusive contracts?
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Nurse pleads guilty to Medicare fraud
- Q/A: New device pass-through categories
- Featured webcast: Assessing the competence of low- and no-volume practitioners
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: HIPAA-compliant phone messages
- Ask the expert: Should medical staff bylaws address employment contracts and exclusive contracts?
- Sneak Peek: Planning for homecare can reduce avoidable readmissions
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Featured webcast: Assessing the competence of low- and no-volume practitioners
- To sign or not to sign
- Bill and charge for supplies correctly to reduce risk and minimize lost revenue
- Blanket Warmers, What Is Safe?
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Searched
