Massachusetts rule prohibiting ambulance diversion does not increase ED wait times
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, December 16, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Massachusetts public health officials have analyzed the state's new policy stipulating that hospitals cannot turn away ambulances and found that emergency department (ED) wait times have not gotten worse, reports The Boston Globe. The practice, called diversion, was allowed in the state until December 2008. Beginning this past January, hospitals had to accept all ambulances. Prior to this hospitals would often turn ambulances away when staff members determined the EDs were overcrowded.
Data analyzed since the new policy began show that wait times have stayed consistent at 75 Massachusetts EDs. The average wait times are still lengthy—an average stay of 2.5 hours for patients not admitted and 5.5 hours for patients who are admitted—but the fact that they did not increase is a sign of better management of patients, reports the Globe. The busiest EDs have had to rethink some of their processes for triaging and assessing patients.
To read more from The Boston Globe, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Avoid the trap of probable diagnoses
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Q&A: Coding 'aspiration without pneumonia'
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Searched
