The patient’s role in error reporting
Patient Safety Monitor, September 1, 2009
In the past ten years, a fair amount of headway has been made in refining error reporting systems, especially since the Institute of Medicine 1999 report, To Err Is Human. More recently, Patient Safety Organizations have been introduced to the healthcare industry. Many states require hospitals to report adverse events to a state reporting system, and most hospitals have mechanisms for staff members to report, investigate, and analyze these events.
However, one point of view missing from these reporting systems is that of patients and their families.
- CMS seeks comment on quality measures
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q&A: Why do we receive an edit when reporting fluoroscopy?
- Welcome to the new and improved APCs Insider!
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Differentiate between types of wound debridement
- Complications from immobility by body system
- ICD-10 tip: Coding for infectious and parasitic diseases
- Residency coordinator salaries
- Washington passes legislation to increase residency positions
- Understand the tracer methodology survey
- Tip of the week: Prior to a fair hearing, allow the physician in question to object to hearing panel members
- New malnutrition criteria could help ensure consistent coding
- Joint Commission updates FAQs
- ICD-10 opponents mount last-ditch roadblocks to implementation
- Clinical documentation tips for ICD-10