Study reveals that some urgent pages to physicians don’t reach intended recipient
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, June 10, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
A study in the Archives of Internal Medicine attempted to examine how often pages to physicians were lost or not delivered to the correct physician. Communication failures at hospitals often result in patient harm or near miss events. Researchers in two Canadian academic teaching hospitals tried to quantify how often pages, one type of communication, were sent to the incorrect physicians. They found this happened 14% of the time; of those pages, 47% concerned critical messages, requiring immediate response.
The Wall Street Health Blog reported on this study, and said that researchers on the study want to ensure there are protocols in place for when the paging system fails.
Click here to find the Wall Street Journal's Health Blog post.
Click here to find the abstract from the Archives of Internal Medicine.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Related Products
-
Patient Safety Monitor
As part of your Patient Safety Monitor membership, you'll receive Briefings on Patient Safety. In this 12-page monthly...
-
Patient Safety Monitor Alert
This e-mail newsletter provides healthcare professionals with the latest patient safety news, while offering useful...
-
Patient Safety Quality Monthly
Ken Rohde, Senior Consultant for The Greeley Company with over 25 years of experience in quality management. His roles in...
-
Critical Test Results Troubleshooter:
Improve your hospital's system of critical test results (CTR) communication with this handy book and CD-ROM set. It provides...
-
Core Skills for Hospital Case Managers:
A guide to fundamental case management responsibilities, Core Skills for Hospital Case Managers serves as a training...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched