Part of U.S. stimulus bill will give money to comparison of medical treatments
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, February 18, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
A portion of the recently passed $787 economic stimulus bill will provide money for studying different treatments for the same illnesses, reports The New York Times. The research is being undertaken in hopes to find a way to quell the rising cost of healthcare, which in 2007 equaled $2.2 trillion, and is expected to grow. The costs associated with healthcare are seen as one of the bigger problems facing the U.S. economy. Often seen in conjunction with costs is the notion that there are many ways to treat different illnesses, without one being deemed most effective. It is hoped that this research will help the healthcare system cut down on costly prescriptions of treatments that are not proven to work as well as others.
A council of 15 federal employees will study which medications, surgeries, medical devices, and other treatments work best for treating specific conditions. Although the government has been studying medications, medical devices, and surgeries for years, it has been doing so in an effort to determine if they are safe, not whether any alternatives may exist that provide more effective treatment.
To read the article click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A: Coding 'aspiration without pneumonia'
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Avoid the trap of probable diagnoses
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Searched
