Scotland’s government requires hospitals to cut C. diff in half
Patient Safety Monitor: Global Edition, January 20, 2009
The Scottish government, working with infection experts, has announced a 15-point plan to help its hospitals cut the rate of Clostridium difficile (C. diff) by 50% during the next two years, reports the Scotsman.
The 50% reduction rate requirement is a raise from the current 30% reduction hospitals are currently working toward, a rate which has been deemed insufficient by the government. Other proposals for the plan include the creation for a hospital-acquired infection "commissioner" to oversee the number of agencies tackling infections, to provide better in-depth analysis of the infection outbreaks, as well as better hand washing facilities.
To read more, click here.
Comments
0 comments on “Scotland’s government requires hospitals to cut C. diff in half ”
Related Products
-
Patient Safety Monitor
As part of your Patient Safety Monitor membership, you'll receive Briefings on Patient Safety. In this 12-page monthly...
-
Patient Safety Monitor Alert
This e-mail newsletter provides healthcare professionals with the latest patient safety news, while offering useful...
-
Occurrence Reporting:
Take advantage of the information occurrence reports provide and make sustainable enhancements at your facility. Expert...
-
Meeting Anesthesia and Sedation Challenges
Join expert speakers Mary Hoppa, MD and Bud Pate, REHS, as they provide sustainable, comprehensive solutions to help you...
-
Proven Methods for Drastically Reducing CAUTIs
Join nurse practitioner Mikel Gray, PhD, PNP, FNP, CUNP CCCN, FAANP, FAAN, and chief of infection prevention and 2012 APIC...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A: Coding 'aspiration without pneumonia'
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Avoid the trap of probable diagnoses
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Searched