Medical devices lag behind technology outside of healthcare
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, January 7, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
The inability of medical devices to communicate with each other is becoming a growing concern among hospital staff members, reports The Boston Globe. Significant medical errors that result in patient harm, and sometimes death, can be attributed to medical equipment that does not operate in conjunction with other medical equipment. In October 2008, some major hospitals and institutions, including Partners HealthCare, Massachusetts General Hospital, Johns Hopkins Medicine, and Kaiser Permanente, created a task force to address the issue. It released language for hospitals to use when entering into contracts with the sellers of medical devices that requires the equipment to communicate with other medical devices.
Although there has been a bigger push for greater connectivity as of late, the industry is slow to change because it's been accepted that technology is in a state of rapid growth, the article says. Additionally, many doctors and nurses don't realize that great improvements for interoperability can be made because they have not been exposed to such in the medical field.
To read more, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Comments
0 comments on “Medical devices lag behind technology outside of healthcare ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A: Coding 'aspiration without pneumonia'
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Avoid the trap of probable diagnoses
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Searched
