New ER requirements force Massachusetts hospitals to bolster patient flow efforts
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, December 31, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
As of January 1, Massachusetts hospitals will no longer be able to go on "diversion" and declare themselves unable to accept new patients via ambulance, reports The Boston Globe. The new rule has forced emergency rooms (ER) and hospitals throughout the state to reconsider their daily practices in order to increase patient flow, and ultimately patient discharge. Patients are often stuck in the ER due to a backup on patient floors.
Some hospitals have suspended teaching rounds when the doctor is called to tend to patients. Tufts Medical center has taken up the practice of requiring that phlebotomists draw patient's blood earlier in the morning in an effort to speed up test results and move up the time of discharge. Many hospitals have been using these new techniques already, which can be seen in a drop of more than 4,000 hours during which hospitals were on diversion through November 2008, compared to through November 2007.
The practice of diverting patients often was unsafe, as patients were then transferred to hospitals that did not have their medical records or at which they had no history. Additionally, diverting ambulances does nothing to affect the underlying patient flow problem existing in hospitals, the article says.
To read the article, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Comments
0 comments on “New ER requirements force Massachusetts hospitals to bolster patient flow efforts ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A: Coding 'aspiration without pneumonia'
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Avoid the trap of probable diagnoses
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Searched
